MI Gateway Volume 12, Issue 3 (September 2018)

Volume 12, Issue 3

Recent Advances of PET Chemistry in Flow



MI Gateway is a quarterly member information service published under the direction of the Center for Molecular Imaging Innovation and Translation leadership and SNMMI.

IN THIS ISSUE

Recent Advances of PET Chemistry in Flow

CMIIT NEWS

MI in the Literature

MI in the News

Calendar of Events

MI Gateway
Editorial Board

Walter Akers, DVM, PhD
Cathy S. Cutler, PhD
Leslie Flynt, MD
Anthony Giamis, PhD
Catalin I. Grigore, MIS, NMAA, CNMT
Alexander L. Klibanov, PhD

Issue Editor
Anthony Giamis, PhD

Managing Editor
Sarah Schlieder

©2018 by SNMMI

 


Recent Advances of PET Chemistry in Flow

Lee Collier, PhD, Advion Inc., Ithaca, NY

Microfluidics have revolutionized the radiopharmaceuticals field, particularly in both pre-clinical and clinical production of labeled radiotracers. Microfluidics reduce reaction times, consumption of reagents, and the complexity of reaction mixtures while they increase radiochemical yields and optimize reaction parameters for labeling. In short, they allow for the rapid optimization of chemical processes and increase productivity.

 

There are three broadly defined types of microfluidics (Figure 1): Continuous-flow microfluidics, microreactors and droplet/digital microfluidics. This review covers the various uses and advantages of continuous-flow microfluidics.

The first reported synthesis PET radiotracers in a microfluidic device were published nearly two decades ago and demonstrated that this technology is capable of providing multi-doses of fluorine-18 (18F; t1/2 = 109.7 min) labeled compounds.4 Initially, reactions were limited to simple nucleophilic displacements of tosylates, mesylates and triflates to prepare such compounds as 18F-FDG. However, the choice of substrates now includes fluorodenitration,5 ammonium salts,5 iodonium salts,6-9 halides, etc.

A number of papers and reviews have been published on the use of radiotracers in drug development10-15 and radiotracer production.9,16-34 Continuous-flow microfluidics have exciting advantages over traditional radiochemical synthesis, including low sample and reagent consumption, faster kinetics, high throughput screening of reaction conditions, high reproducibility, easy automation of the processes and enhanced product yields, such as the ability to synthesize materials that cannot be prepared in conventional apparatus due to the rapid degradation of precursor or product under the reaction conditions. Implementation of such a method has significantly accelerated the process of synthesizing labeled compounds and positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals.1, 24 To date, over a hundred radiolabeled compounds have been synthesized in continuous-flow microfluidic devices for PET applications.

Fluoride drying for use in microfluidics

One major consideration of [18F]fluoride is the method used to prepare the fluoride for reaction. A review of the major methods observed that in the microfluidic environment, radiofluorinations can tolerate up to ~5 percent water for a number of precursors and conditions tested in the paper.47

Microfluidic reaction benefits

Many reports have shown that there are significant improvements using microfluidics compared to classic reaction methodologies.

Optimization in a classical vial / reactor system

It is possible to have an array or matrix of different concentrations and amounts of reagents and run these at different temperatures, monitoring them over time by removing aliquots. The downside of this type of reaction set-up is that each reaction will consume precursors/reagents, and the automated system must be cleaned between each reaction.

Optimization in a microfluidic environment

From a single setup of the system, more than 25 reaction conditions, including temperature, residence time (equivalent to the reaction time), precursor concentration and multistep reactions, may be optimized during these operations.24 This reduces the utilization of reagents, including isotopes, to a minimum and can normally be performed in less than 2 hours. The analysis of the reaction mixture typically is the rate-limiting step.

Reduction in autoradiolysis effects

Autoradiolysis is the degradation of radioactively labeled compounds due to the activity of the labeled compounds and typically increases with activity concentration. Microfluidic devices can be designed to reduce this autoradiolysis by utilizing shapes that exclude the positron interaction, which typically causes the autoradiolysis effects. Rensch et al. noted that about 85 percent of the positron’s kinetic energy is deposited in the first 1 mm and only 13 percent within the first 100 µm.48 Microfluidic synthesis of radiotracers such as [18F]FPEB show no significant reduction in radiochemical yield over the range of activities from 20 mCi or ~45 mCi/mL to 4.5 Ci or >10,000 mCi/mL, using a 100 µm ID reactor.25

Loss of yield when precursor or product degrades at elevated temperature

 

In vial/reaction vessel systems the loss of either precursor and/or product due to the prolonged heating during the radiochemical synthesis is a major cause of low radiochemical yield. The microfluidic systems have shown significant improvement in yield by only heating the portion of the reagents/product that is currently in the microfluidic reactor. Once the reaction mixture leaves the heated area of the microfluidic environment, it can be quickly cooled, decreasing the degradation of the product. This is a result of the large surface-area-to-volume ratio in the microfluidic environment (Figure 2).

One such example of this was shown by Philippe et al. in the synthesis of [18F]FE@SNAP (2) (Figure 3).49 The highest radiochemical incorporation yields were found to be zero percent for the vessel-based reaction and ~44 percent for the microfluidic reaction.

Multi-step reactions

In a typical vial/reaction-based system, multistep reactions are performed as discrete steps. For example, the incorporation of the isotope is completed in one step followed by hydrolysis or coupling to a precursor, protein or peptide. In the microfluidic environment, two (or more) steps may be performed in a continuous manner,50-53 such as in the formation of a pendant group, which is later attached to a substrate (either a precursor, a protein or peptide). For example, Cummin et al. demonstrated the microfluidic synthesis of the [18F]F-Py-TFP prosthetic group with radiochemical yields of up to 97 percent and a synthesis time of 3 minutes. This pendant group was then directly transferred to second microfluidic reactor and then coupled to prepare [18F]F-Py-YGGFL (Figure 4). The overall radiochemical yield within 8 minutes, starting from anhydrous [18F]fluoride, was determined to be 28 percent.51

 

Recently, the combination of microfluidics for the incorporation of the radioisotope and “flow hydrogenation” for the rapid (<3 minutes, using pressures and temperatures of up to 100 bar and 150˚C) reduction or deprotection of PET radiotracers has been shown in the synthesis of [18F]CABS13 (9) (Figure 5).54,55

Isotopes other than [18F]fluoride

While the main isotope used with microfluidics has been limited to [18F] fluoride, there has been a recent explosion in the last few years of other useful isotopes.

Carbon-11

The next most common isotope used is [11C]carbon and in a number of forms, such as [11C]methyl iodide, [11C]methyl triflate and [11C]carbon monoxide. The reactions performed with [11C]methyl iodide and [11C]methyl triflate include O-methylation,56 N-methylation of amino species,57  S-methylation of thiol species and carbonylation reactions using [11C]carbon monoxide.32,58 Kealey et al. found that the major benefit to using microfluidics, compared to the conventional vial-based systems, was the elimination of unwanted radioactive emissions and the reduction in yield due to the partitioning of the volatile radioactive agent to the headspace during the heating process of a conventional system (Figure 6).58

Metals

Most researchers have found that the microfluidic approach generally outperforms conventional radiosynthetic methods when labeling common chelated peptides and proteins. Numerous metals have been used to label proteins, such as 64Cu, 68Ga, 89Zr, 90Y, 99mTc, 111In and 211At. The initial studies were performed using classic silica surfaces, either etched surfaces or silica capillaries. However, there were noted losses related to the binding of some of the metals to a differing level depending on the isotope and the solvents and temperatures being used. Recently, the glass surfaces have been replaced by polymers, such as PEEK59 or poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS)-based microfluidic devices,60 with reductions in the binding of metals to the microfluidic surfaces. It has been noted that increasing the reaction temperature can enhance the reaction rates and improve the incorporation yield. Microfluidics, using peptides, have been performed at temperatures of up to 100˚C without significant reduction in activity of most of the peptides31.

Purification

Typically, the purification of the products prepared by microfluidics is performed by classical semi-preparative HPLC, usually followed by solid phase extraction (SPE) reformulations or by using biocompatible HPLC solvents.25,40 There are three main methods of improving purification simplicity – critical for rodent animal study. Typically, 100-200 µCi must be injected in a volume of 100 µl or less because of the low blood volume of the animal. Normal SPE reformulation methods will yield ~10 mLs of a 10 percent ethanol/saline solution but require high starting activities to possess a sufficient radioactive concentration.

The first method is to substitute the HPLC column/SPE reformulation methodology with a simple method using SPE columns to purify the final radiotracer, since microfluidic methodologies generally lead to much cleaner crude reaction mixtures,25 and this allows for a much simpler purification methodology53,61,62.

The second method involves the use of analytical columns instead of the standard semi-prep columns, as well as the replacement of the standard loop with a self-packed trapping cartridge or monolithic column. The solvents used in the purification are normally biocompatible solvents, such as ethanol with water or saline solutions. The product is normally collected in a volume of 0.25-1 mL and because of the higher resolution of analytical columns, impurity peaks may be separated from the product that cannot be removed using classical semi-preparative columns.63,64

The third method is the use of a microfluidic concentration system for the reduction of the total solvent in the solution.65 Chao et al. described a compact microfluidic device based on membrane distillation.66 The system is compact in size and can concentrate the solutions from ~10 mL down to ~1-1.5 mL in ~9-14 minutes. The initial solvents can contain up to 80 percent acetonitrile/water or up to 40 percent ethanol/water.

Future work

Further development of microchip fabrication and materials will improve the availability and reduce the cost of individual chips of a more complex design.10,67-73 The proven reduction in radiolysis and expansion of reaction types that are able to be performed in a microfluidic environment, including photochemistry,74 direct use of gases in flow,75 microchip quality control processes,76-78 metabolite analysis79 and the direct measurement of reaction kinetics80 will continue to drive the use of microfluidics. An interesting and expanding area of research is the use of organs on a chip (OC), which has the ability to mimic the response of real organs and has the potential to substitute for animal models, reducing the cost and time required to study radiotracers in controlled microenvironments.68,71,72,81

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank all of the researchers who have performed pioneering work in the area of microfluidics, which we have built upon, as well as the researchers and collaborators with the vision to look to the future and embrace new technologies for radiotracer development.

References

  1. Pascali G, Watts P and Salvadori PA. Microfluidics in radiopharmaceutical chemistry. Nucl Med Biol 2013; 40: 776-787. 2013/05/21. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.04.004.
  2. Watts P, Pascali G and Salvadori PA. Positron Emission Tomography Radiosynthesis in Microreactors. Journal of Flow Chemistry 2012; 2: 37-42. DOI: 10.1556/JFC-D-12-00010.
  3. Chen S, Javed MR, Kim HK, et al. Radiolabelling diverse positron emission tomography (PET) tracers using a single digital microfluidic reactor chip. Lab Chip 2014; 14: 902-910. 2013/12/20. DOI: 10.1039/c3lc51195b.
  4. Lee CC, Sui G, Elizarov A, et al. Multistep synthesis of a radiolabeled imaging probe using integrated microfluidics. Science 2005; 310: 1793-1796. 2005/12/17. DOI: 10.1126/science.1118919.
  5. Moore TM, Akula MR, Collier L, et al. A rapid microfluidic synthesis of [18F]fluoroarenes from nitroarenes. Appl Radiat Isot 2013; 71: 47-50. 2012/10/23. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.09.013.
  6. Telu S, Chun JH, Simeon FG, et al. Syntheses of mGluR5 PET radioligands through the radiofluorination of diaryliodonium tosylates. Org Biomol Chem 2011; 9: 6629-6638. 2011/08/17. DOI: 10.1039/c1ob05555k.
  7. Chun JH, Telu S, Lu S, et al. Radiofluorination of diaryliodonium tosylates under aqueous-organic and cryptand-free conditions. Org Biomol Chem 2013; 11: 5094-5099. 2013/06/28. DOI: 10.1039/c3ob40742j.
  8. Chun JH, Lu S and Pike VW. Rapid and Efficient Radiosyntheses of Meta-substituted [F]Fluoroarenes from [F]Fluoride Ion and Diaryliodonium Tosylates within a Microreactor. European J Org Chem 2011; 2011: 4439-4447. 2011/10/22. DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201100382.
  9. Calderwood S, Collier TL, Gouverneur V, et al. Synthesis of (18)F-Arenes from Spirocyclic Iodonium(III) Ylides via Continuous-Flow Microfluidics. J Fluor Chem 2015; 178: 249-253. 2016/08/12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2015.08.006.
  10. Xu H, Liu X and Le W. Recent advances in microfluidic models for cancer metastasis research. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2018; 105: 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.04.007.
  11. Voigt W. Advanced PET imaging in oncology: status and developments with current and future relevance to lung cancer care. Curr Opin Oncol 2018; 30: 77-83. 2017/12/19. DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000430.
  12. Wotherspoon AT, Safavi-Naeini M and Banati RB. Microdosing, isotopic labeling, radiotracers and metabolomics: relevance in drug discovery, development and safety. Bioanalysis 2017; 9: 1913-1933. 2017/11/25. DOI: 10.4155/bio-2017-0137.
  13. Kilbourn MR. Small Molecule PET Tracers for Transporter Imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2017; 47: 536-552. 2017/08/23. DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.05.005.
  14. Richardson P. Fluorination methods for drug discovery and development. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2016; 11: 983-999. 2016/08/23. DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2016.1223037.
  15. Collier TL, Normandin MD, Stephenson NA, et al. Synthesis and preliminary PET imaging of (11)C and (18)F isotopologues of the ROS1/ALK inhibitor lorlatinib. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 15761. 2017/06/09. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15761.
  16. Zhang X, Liu F, Knapp KA, et al. A simple microfluidic platform for rapid and efficient production of the radiotracer [(18)F]fallypride. Lab Chip 2018; 18: 1369-1377. 2018/04/17. DOI: 10.1039/c8lc00167g.
  17. Pfaff S, Philippe C, Pichler V, et al. Microfluidic (68)Ga-labeling: a proof of principle study. Dalton Trans 2018; 47: 5997-6004. 2018/04/18. DOI: 10.1039/c8dt00158h.
  18. Liu D, Zhang H, Fontana F, et al. Current developments and applications of microfluidic technology toward clinical translation of nanomedicines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2018; 128: 54-83. 2017/08/13. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.08.003.
  19. Lisova K, Sergeev M, Evans-Axelsson S, et al. Microscale radiosynthesis, preclinical imaging and dosimetry study of [(18)F]AMBF3-TATE: A potential PET tracer for clinical imaging of somatostatin receptors. Nucl Med Biol 2018; 61: 36-44. 2018/05/11. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2018.04.001.
  20. Whittenberg JJ, Li H, Zhou H, et al. "Click Chip" Conjugation of Bifunctional Chelators to Biomolecules. Bioconjug Chem 2017; 28: 986-994. 2017/01/14. DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00703.
  21. Matesic L, Kallinen A, Greguric I, et al. Dose-on-demand production of diverse (18)F-radiotracers for preclinical applications using a continuous flow microfluidic system. Nucl Med Biol 2017; 52: 24-31. 2017/06/10. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2017.05.004.
  22. Wright BD, Whittenberg J, Desai A, et al. Microfluidic Preparation of a 89Zr-Labeled Trastuzumab Single-Patient Dose. J Nucl Med 2016; 57: 747-752. 2016/01/16. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166140.
  23. Rensch C, Lindner S, Salvamoser R, et al. A solvent resistant lab-on-chip platform for radiochemistry applications. Lab Chip 2014; 14: 2556-2564. 2014/06/01. DOI: 10.1039/c4lc00076e.
  24. Pascali G, Matesic L, Collier TL, et al. Optimization of nucleophilic (1)(8)F radiofluorinations using a microfluidic reaction approach. Nat Protoc 2014; 9: 2017-2029. 2014/08/01. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2014.137.
  25. Liang SH, Yokell DL, Normandin MD, et al. First human use of a radiopharmaceutical prepared by continuous-flow microfluidic radiofluorination: proof of concept with the tau imaging agent [18F]T807. Mol Imaging 2014; 13 2014/09/25. DOI: 10.2310/7290.2014.00025.
  26. Liang SH, Yokell DL, Jackson RN, et al. Microfluidic continuous-flow radiosynthesis of [(18)F]FPEB suitable for human PET imaging. Medchemcomm 2014; 5: 432-435. 2014/11/29. DOI: 10.1039/C3MD00335C.
  27. Zeng D, Desai AV, Ranganathan D, et al. Microfluidic radiolabeling of biomolecules with PET radiometals. Nucl Med Biol 2013; 40: 42-51. 2012/10/20. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2012.08.012.
  28. Rensch C, Jackson A, Lindner S, et al. Microfluidics: a groundbreaking technology for PET tracer production? Molecules 2013; 18: 7930-7956. 2013/07/26. DOI: 10.3390/molecules18077930.
  29. Liu Y, Tian M and Zhang H. Microfluidics for synthesis of peptide-based PET tracers. Biomed Res Int 2013; 2013: 839683. 2013/11/30. DOI: 10.1155/2013/839683.
  30. Fortt R and Gee A. Microfluidics: a golden opportunity for positron emission tomography? Future Med Chem 2013; 5: 241-244. 2013/03/08. DOI: 10.4155/fmc.13.8.
  31. Selivanova SV, Mu L, Ungersboeck J, et al. Single-step radiofluorination of peptides using continuous flow microreactor. Org Biomol Chem 2012; 10: 3871-3874. 2012/06/20.
  32. Miller PW, Audrain H, Bender D, et al. Rapid carbon-11 radiolabelling for PET using microfluidics. Chemistry 2011; 17: 460-463. 2011/01/06. DOI: 10.1002/chem.201002644.
  33. Gillies JM, Prenant C, Chimon GN, et al. Microfluidic reactor for the radiosynthesis of PET radiotracers. Appl Radiat Isot 2006; 64: 325-332. 2005/11/18. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.08.007.
  34. Gillies JM, Prenant C, Chimon GN, et al. Microfluidic technology for PET radiochemistry. Appl Radiat Isot 2006; 64: 333-336. 2005/11/18. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.08.009.
  35. Wang MW, Lin WY, Liu K, et al. Microfluidics for positron emission tomography probe development. Mol Imaging 2010; 9: 175-191. 2010/07/21.
  36. Bois F, Gallezot JD, Zheng MQ, et al. Evaluation of [(18)F]-(-)-norchlorofluorohomoepibatidine ([(18)F]-(-)-NCFHEB) as a PET radioligand to image the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in non-human primates. Nucl Med Biol 2015; 42: 570-577. 2015/04/11. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2014.08.003.
  37. Cumming P, Maschauer S, Riss PJ, et al. Radiosynthesis and validation of (1)(8)F-FP-CMT, a phenyltropane with superior properties for imaging the dopamine transporter in living brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2014; 34: 1148-1156. 2014/04/10. DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.63.
  38. Philippe C, Nics L, Zeilinger M, et al. Preparation and First Preclinical Evaluation of [(18)F]FE@SNAP: A Potential PET Tracer for the Melanin-Concentrating Hormone Receptor-1 (MCHR1). Sci Pharm 2013; 81: 625-639. 2013/10/10. DOI: 10.3797/scipharm.1306-02.
  39. Bouvet VR, Wuest M, Wiebe LI, et al. Synthesis of hypoxia imaging agent 1-(5-deoxy-5-fluoro-alpha-D-arabinofuranosyl)-2-nitroimidazole using microfluidic technology. Nucl Med Biol 2011; 38: 235-245. 2011/02/15. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.09.002.
  40. Zheng MQ, Collier L, Bois F, et al. Synthesis of [(18)F]FMISO in a flow-through microfluidic reactor: Development and clinical application. Nucl Med Biol 2015; 42: 578-584. 2015/03/18. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.01.010.
  41. Lebedev A, Miraghaie R, Kotta K, et al. Batch-reactor microfluidic device: first human use of a microfluidically produced PET radiotracer. Lab Chip 2013; 13: 136-145. 2012/11/09. DOI: 10.1039/c2lc40853h.
  42. He P, Haswell SJ, Pamme N, et al. Advances in processes for PET radiotracer synthesis: separation of [(1)(8)F]fluoride from enriched [(1)(8)O]water. Appl Radiat Isot 2014; 91: 64-70. 2014/06/08. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.04.021.
  43. Wessmann SH, Henriksen G and Wester HJ. Cryptate mediated nucleophilic 18F-fluorination without azeotropic drying. Nuklearmedizin 2012; 51: 1-8. 2011/10/13. DOI: 10.3413/Nukmed-0425-11-08.
  44. Wong R, Iwata R, Saiki H, et al. Reactivity of electrochemically concentrated anhydrous [18F]fluoride for microfluidic radiosynthesis of 18F-labeled compounds. Appl Radiat Isot 2012; 70: 193-199. 2011/10/18. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.09.022.
  45. Saiki H, Iwata R, Nakanishi H, et al. Electrochemical concentration of no-carrier-added [(18)F]fluoride from [(18)O]water in a disposable microfluidic cell for radiosynthesis of (18)F-labeled radiopharmaceuticals. Appl Radiat Isot 2010; 68: 1703-1708. 2010/03/02. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.02.005.
  46. Sadeghi S, Liang V, Cheung S, et al. Reusable electrochemical cell for rapid separation of [(1)(8)F]fluoride from [(1)(8)O]water for flow-through synthesis of (1)(8)F-labeled tracers. Appl Radiat Isot 2013; 75: 85-94. 2013/03/12. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.12.021.
  47. Pascali G, De Simone M, Matesic L, et al. Tolerance of Water in Microfluidic Radiofluorinations: A Potential Methodological Shift? Journal of Flow Chemistry 2014; 4: 86-91. DOI: 10.1556/JFC-D-13-00034.
  48. Rensch C, Waengler B, Yaroshenko A, et al. Microfluidic reactor geometries for radiolysis reduction in radiopharmaceuticals. Appl Radiat Isot 2012; 70: 1691-1697. 2012/07/04. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.03.004.
  49. Philippe C, Ungersboeck J, Schirmer E, et al. [(1)(8)F]FE@SNAP-A new PET tracer for the melanin concentrating hormone receptor 1 (MCHR1): microfluidic and vessel-based approaches. Bioorg Med Chem 2012; 20: 5936-5940. 2012/08/28. DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.07.051.
  50. Collier TL, Liang SH, Mann JJ, et al. Microfluidic radiosynthesis of [(18)F]FEMPT, a high affinity PET radiotracer for imaging serotonin receptors. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry 2017; 13: 2922-2927. DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.13.285.
  51. Cumming RC, Olberg DE and Sutcliffe JL. Rapid 18F-radiolabeling of peptides from [18F]fluoride using a single microfluidics device. RSC Advances 2014; 4: 49529-49534. 10.1039/C4RA10520F. DOI: 10.1039/C4RA10520F.
  52. Arima V, Pascali G, Lade O, et al. Radiochemistry on chip: towards dose-on-demand synthesis of PET radiopharmaceuticals. Lab Chip 2013; 13: 2328-2336. 2013/05/04. DOI: 10.1039/c3lc00055a.
  53. Pascali G, Nannavecchia G, Pitzianti S, et al. Dose-on-demand of diverse 18F-fluorocholine derivatives through a two-step microfluidic approach. Nucl Med Biol 2011; 38: 637-644. 2011/07/02. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.01.005.
  54. Liang SH, Collier TL, Rotstein BH, et al. Rapid microfluidic flow hydrogenation for reduction or deprotection of 18F-labeled compounds. Chem Commun (Camb) 2013; 49: 8755-8757. 2013/08/21. DOI: 10.1039/c3cc45166f.
  55. Liang SH, Holland JP, Stephenson NA, et al. PET neuroimaging studies of [(18)F]CABS13 in a double transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease and nonhuman primates. ACS Chem Neurosci 2015; 6: 535-541. 2015/03/18. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00055.
  56. Lu SY and Pike VW. Micro-reactors for PET tracer labeling. Ernst Schering Res Found Workshop 2007: 271-287. 2006/12/19.
  57. Ungersboeck J, Philippe C, Haeusler D, et al. Optimization of [11C]DASB-synthesis: vessel-based and flow-through microreactor methods. Appl Radiat Isot 2012; 70: 2615-2620. 2012/09/04. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.08.001.
  58. Kealey S, Plisson C, Collier TL, et al. Microfluidic reactions using [11C]carbon monoxide solutions for the synthesis of a positron emission tomography radiotracer. Org Biomol Chem 2011; 9: 3313-3319. 2011/03/26. DOI: 10.1039/c0ob00631a.
  59. Collier L. unpublished results.
  60. Wheeler TD, Zeng D, Desai AV, et al. Microfluidic labeling of biomolecules with radiometals for use in nuclear medicine. Lab Chip 2010; 10: 3387-3396. 2010/10/14. DOI: 10.1039/c0lc00162g.
  61. Pascali G, Berton A, DeSimone M, et al. Hardware and software modifications on the Advion NanoTek microfluidic platform to extend flexibility for radiochemical synthesis. Appl Radiat Isot 2014; 84: 40-47. 2013/12/04. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.10.020.
  62. Javed MR, Chen S, Kim HK, et al. Efficient radiosynthesis of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine using electrowetting-on-dielectric digital microfluidic chip. J Nucl Med 2014; 55: 321-328. 2013/12/25. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.121053.
  63. Collier T, Akula M and Liang S. Purification of radiotracers produced by both microfluidic and conventional modules. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2014; 55: 1245.
  64. Collier LK, TN, US). DEVICE FOR MATERIAL PURIFICATION. United States, 2013.
  65. Tseng WY and van Dam RM. Compact microfluidic device for rapid concentration of PET tracers. Lab Chip 2014; 14: 2293-2302. 2014/05/16. DOI: 10.1039/c4lc00286e.
  66. Chao PH, Collins J, Argus JP, et al. Automatic concentration and reformulation of PET tracers via microfluidic membrane distillation. Lab Chip 2017; 17: 1802-1816. 2017/04/27. DOI: 10.1039/c6lc01569g.
  67. Underhill GH and Khetani SR. Bioengineered Liver Models for Drug Testing and Cell Differentiation Studies. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 5: 426-439 e421. 2018/04/21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.11.012.
  68. Ronaldson-Bouchard K and Vunjak-Novakovic G. Organs-on-a-Chip: A Fast Track for Engineered Human Tissues in Drug Development. Cell Stem Cell 2018; 22: 310-324. 2018/03/03. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.02.011.
  69. Li Y, Zhu K, Liu X, et al. Blood-Vessel-on-a-Chip Platforms for Evaluating Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems. Curr Drug Metab 2018; 19: 100-109. 2017/09/28. DOI: 10.2174/1389200218666170925114636.
  70. Kim AA, Nekimken AL, Fechner S, et al. Microfluidics for mechanobiology of model organisms. Methods Cell Biol 2018; 146: 217-259. 2018/07/25. DOI: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2018.05.010.
  71. Zhang B and Radisic M. Organ-on-a-chip devices advance to market. Lab Chip 2017; 17: 2395-2420. 2017/06/16. DOI: 10.1039/c6lc01554a.
  72. Yi HG, Lee H and Cho DW. 3D Printing of Organs-On-Chips. Bioengineering (Basel) 2017; 4 2017/09/28. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering4010010.
  73. Chiu DT, deMello AJ, Di Carlo D, et al. Small but Perfectly Formed? Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities for Microfluidics in the Chemical and Biological Sciences. Chem 2017; 2: 201-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2017.01.009.
  74. Oelgemoller M and Shvydkiv O. Recent advances in microflow photochemistry. Molecules 2011; 16: 7522-7550. 2011/09/07. DOI: 10.3390/molecules16097522.
  75. Mallia CJ and Baxendale IR. The Use of Gases in Flow Synthesis. Organic Process Research & Development 2016; 20: 327-360. DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00222.
  76. Ly J, Ha NS, Cheung S, et al. Toward miniaturized analysis of chemical identity and purity of radiopharmaceuticals via microchip electrophoresis. Anal Bioanal Chem 2018; 410: 2423-2436. 2018/02/23. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-0924-y.
  77. Tarn MD, Maneuski D, Alexander R, et al. Positron detection in silica monoliths for miniaturised quality control of PET radiotracers. Chem Commun (Camb) 2016; 52: 7221-7224. 2016/04/01. DOI: 10.1039/c6cc00660d.
  78. Taggart MP, Tarn MD, Esfahani MM, et al. Development of radiodetection systems towards miniaturised quality control of PET and SPECT radiopharmaceuticals. Lab Chip 2016; 16: 1605-1616. 2016/04/06. DOI: 10.1039/c6lc00099a.
  79. Convert L, Baril FG, Boisselle V, et al. Blood compatible microfluidic system for pharmacokinetic studies in small animals. Lab Chip 2012; 12: 4683-4692. 2012/09/25. DOI: 10.1039/c2lc40550d.
  80. Liu Z, Schaap KS, Ballemans L, et al. Measurement of reaction kinetics of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE using a microfluidic system. Dalton Trans 2017; 46: 14669-14676. 2017/09/13. DOI: 10.1039/c7dt01830d.
  81. Aziz AUR, Geng C, Fu M, et al. The Role of Microfluidics for Organ on Chip Simulations. Bioengineering (Basel) 2017; 4 2017/09/28. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering4020039.

 

 


CMIIT NEWS

During the SNMMI Annual Meeting in Philadelphia, the following CMIIT awards were presented by CMIIT 2016-2018 President Buck E. Rogers, PhD

2018 CMIIT Laboratory Professionals Award

Shelley Acuff, CNMT, RT(R)(CT), clinical research leader of Molecular Imaging and Translational Research/Radiology at the University of Tennessee Medical Center, received the 2018 CMIIT Laboratory Professionals Award, which recognizes a laboratory professional who has developed innovative and high-impact tools, techniques, and/or practices in molecular imaging. The CMIIT Laboratory Professionals Award winner receives free registration to the SNMMI Annual Meeting and a $1,000 travel reimbursement. This award was made possible through a grant from the Education and Research Foundation for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

 

CMIIT 2018-2019 Board of Directors

Congratulations to the board members selected during the 2018 elections, whose terms began during the SNMMI Annual Meeting in June:

Vice President – Cathy S. Cutler, PhD

Secretary/TreasurerDustin Osborne, PhD, DABSNM

Board Member, NuclearHossein Jadvar, MD, PhD, MPH, MBA, FACNM, FSNMMI and Katherine Binzel, PhD

Board Member, non-Nuclear – Ali Azhdarinia, PhD and Kayvan Rahimi Keshari, PhD

 

The board also thanked the following three outgoing board members for their service to CMIIT:

Jonathan McConathy, MD, PhD, Walter Akers, DVM, PhD, and Thomas Reiner, PhD

 

The full 2018-2019 CMIIT Board:

PRESIDENTKimberly Kelly, PhD

VICE-PRESIDENTCathy Cutler, PhD

SECRETARY/TREASURERDustin Osborne, PhD, DABSNM

IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENTBuck Rogers, PhD

BOARD MEMBERS:

Ali Azhdarinia, PhD

Elizabeth A. Bailey, PhD

Katherine Binzel, PhD

Delphine L. Chen, MD

Georges N. El Fakhri, PhD

Hossein Jadvar, MD, PhD, MPH, MBA, FACNM, FSNMMI

Kayvan Rahimi Keshari, PhD

Suzanne E. Lapi, PhD

Mark “Marty” Pagel, PhD

Todd E. Peterson, PhD

Neil A. Petry, MS, RPh, BCNP

Albert J. Sinusas, MD, FACC, FAHA

BOARD INTERNThomas Ng, MD, PhD

Ex-Officio MembersDavid Dick, PhD – RPSC President and Terrence Ruddy, MD – CVC President

2018 CMIIT Young Investigators Awards

The Young Investigator Awards (YIA) recognize the best abstracts presented during the CMIIT Young Investigators Session. Young Investigators are defined as individuals within five years of completing a residency training program or a PhD program (five years from the YIA presentation date).
The 2018 winners are:

  • 1st Place ($500) – Rui Tian, National Institutes of Health

Abstract:“Evans Blue Attachment Enhances Somatostatin Receptor Subtype-2 Imaging and Radiotherapy”

  • 2nd Place ($300) – Zhantong Wang, National Institutes of Health

Abstract: “An Improved Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Targeting Agent for Prostate Cancer Imaging and Therapy”

  • 3rd Place ($200) – Carolina A. Ferreira, MS, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Abstract: “Vasculature-based Differential Tumor Uptake of Radiolabeled Ultrasmall Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles in Breast Cancers Models”

 


MI in the Literature

Each month, the CMIIT Editorial Board selects some of the top molecular imaging research papers from all papers indexed by PubMed. Below are links to these papers (free full text available).

A Dual-Modality Hybrid Imaging System Harnesses Radioluminescence and Sound to Reveal Molecular Pathology of Atherosclerotic Plaques
Zaman RT, Yousefi S, Long SR, Saito T, Mandella M, Qiu Z, Chen R, Contag CH, Gambhir SS, Chin FT, Khuri-Yakub BT, McConnell MV, Shung KK, Xing L. PMID: 29895966

The human somatostatin receptor type 2 as an imaging and suicide reporter gene for pluripotent stem cell-derived therapy of myocardial infarction
Neyrinck K, Breuls N, Holvoet B, Oosterlinck W, Wolfs E, Vanbilloen H, Gheysens O, Duelen R, Gsell W, Lambrichts I, Himmelreich U, Verfaillie CM, Sampaolesi M, Deroose CM. PMID: 29774076

Comparative Evaluation of Radioiodine and Technetium-Labeled DARPin 9_29 for Radionuclide Molecular Imaging of HER2 Expression in Malignant Tumors
Vorobyeva A, Bragina O, Altai M, Mitran B, Orlova A, Shulga A, Proshkina G, Chernov V, Tolmachev V, Deyev S. PMID: 29977173

Molecular Imaging of endometrial sentinel lymph nodes utilizing fluorescent-labeled Tilmanocept during robotic-assisted surgery in a porcine model
Anderson KM, Barback CV, Qin Z, Hall DJ, Hoh CK, Vera DR, McHale MT. PMID: 29965996

First-in-human study of PET and optical dual-modality image-guided surgery in glioblastoma using 68Ga-IRDye800CW-BBN
Li D, Zhang J, Chi C, Xiao X, Wang J, Lang L, Ali I, Niu G6, Zhang L, Tian J, Ji N, Zhu Z, Chen X. PMID: 29721096

A Novel Metal-Based Imaging Probe for Targeted Dual-Modality SPECT/MR Imaging of Angiogenesis
Tsoukalas C, Psimadas D, Kastis GA, Koutoulidis V, Harris AL, Paravatou-Petsotas M, Karageorgou M, Furenlid LR, Moulopoulos LA, Stamopoulos D, Bouziotis P. PMID: 29974048

Radionuclide-fluorescence Reporter Gene Imaging to Track Tumor Progression in Rodent Tumor Models
Volpe A, Man F, Lim L, Khoshnevisan A, Blower J, Blower PJ, Fruhwirth GO. PMID: 29608157

Tumor-targeted Dual-modality Imaging to Improve Intraoperative Visualization of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A First in Man Study
Hekman MC, Rijpkema M, Muselaers CH, Oosterwijk E, Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA, Boerman OC, Oyen WJ, Langenhuijsen JF, Mulders PF. PMID: 29721070

 


MI in the News

MI Gateway presents a sampling of research and news of interest to the community of molecular imaging scientists.

Hybrid heart imaging can foresee major cardiac events
Health Data Management
Researchers examined whether hybrid imaging, performed by fusing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with nuclear stress testing by use of myocardial perfusion imaging with single photon emission tomography (SPECT) could provide more information of a heart’s anatomy and function in a non-invasive manner. Study results indicate that it can improve treatment decision-making and help avoid unnecessary invasive angiographies.

AI enables stress-first SPECT MPI protocol
Aunt Minnie
A multi-institutional and multinational research group found that a machine-learning algorithm outperformed visual diagnosis or automated total perfusion deficit analysis for predicting the presence of CAD — including high-risk CAD — without increasing false-positive results. As a result, patients with a normal score from the machine-learning algorithm could safely be discharged and not have to receive rest imaging.

Novel theranostic agent designed for precise tumor diagnosis and therapy
News-Medical
A novel, intelligent theranostic agent for precise tumor diagnosis and therapy has been developed that remains as small molecules while circulating in the bloodstream, can then self-assemble into larger nanostructures in the tumor, and be activated by the tumor microenvironment for therapy guided by photoacoustic imaging.

Novel PET, SPECT techniques help track, modify T cells for immunotherapy
Health Imaging
With PET and SPECT, researchers have demonstrated that T cells can be modified with the DOTA antibody reporter 1 (DAbR1) gene to enable in vivo tracking for immunotherapy.

TOF-PET/MRI allows lower FDG dose for breast cases
Aunt Minnie
Clinicians can reduce a standard dose of FDG by as much as 90 percent and still achieve clinically acceptable PET image quality in time-of-flight (TOF) PET/MRI scans for breast cancer.

Nuclear Imaging Moves Toward Digital Detector Technology
Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology
Nuclear imaging technology for both SPECT and PET have made advancements in the past couple years. The main drivers for this have been a movement to digital imaging detectors to improve image quality and address radiation dose concerns, reimbursement and radiotracer supply issues. Other advancements have come in the areas of software to improve image reconstruction quality, offer better clinical qualification and analytics data.

Laser-sonic scanner aims to replace mammograms for finding breast cancer
Science Daily
Caltech researchers have developed a laser-sonic scanning system, known as photoacoustic computed tomography, or PACT, that can find tumors in as little as 15 seconds by shining pulses of light into the breast.

Study demonstrates promise of new imaging method for precise brain cancer diagnostics
News-Medical
A research team in China and Singapore reports the first NIR-II fluorescent molecule with aggregation-induced-emission (AIE) characteristics for dual fluorescence and photoacoustic imaging to diagnosis brain cancer.

Robot-assisted imaging may hasten treatment for prostate cancer patients
Health Imaging

Researchers have successfully used robot-assisted multispectral-fluorescence imaging to distinguish between healthy and diseased lymphatic flow patterns in prostate and lower limb-draining lymph nodes. The method may reduce the use of invasive extended pelvic lymph node dissections for prostate cancer.

Scientists develop a new approach for efficient cancer therapy
News-Medical
Two synergistic drug components combined in a dimer within polymeric nanotransporters are activated when the dimer is split within the tumor. High concentrations of the drug are delivered to the tumor with few side effects. In addition, the photosensitizer is a fluorescent dye, and it can bind the radioisotope copper-64, which enables visualization with both fluorescence imaging and PET. Quantitative PET allows for precise monitoring of the dimer, as well as confirmation of its pharmacokinetics and biodistribution in vivo.

 

Calendar of Events

International Conference on Advanced Microbiology and Research
September 19 – 20, 2018
Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Hong Kong Hybrid PET-Imaging Symposium and Workshop 2018
September 29 – October 1, 2018
Hong Kong

88th Annual Meeting of the American Thyroid Association
October 3 – 7, 2018
Washington, DC

Pharmaceutics & Novel Drug Delivery Systems 2018
October 4 – 6, 2018
Moscow, Russia

The 18th International Cancer Imaging Society
October 7 – 9, 2018
Menton, France

EANM'18: 31st Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine
October 13 – 17, 2018
Dusseldorf, Germany

World Congress on Breast Cancer 2018
October 15 – 16, 2018
Rome, Italy

7th European Clinical Microbiology Congress
November 1 –2, 2018
London, UK

World Congress on Bio-organic and Medicinal Chemistry
November 12 – 13, 2018
Dubai, UAE

Joint Meeting of the British Nuclear Medicine Society and Irish Nuclear Medicine Association
November 19, 2018
Dublin, Ireland

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Download Acrobat Reader